Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlatan's avatar

I'm a clinical psychologist/psychotherapist and I see immediately the relevance of Halvorson's insights in psychotherapy/counseling. However, I also know that not-to-be-completely-understood or known by another may actually be an unstated/unconscious goal for an individual such that the fear of being completely known leaves them feeling vulnerable for some reason. Hence, they are motivated to obscure/obfuscate the knowing process through incomplete self-disclosure or conflicting behaviors.

On the other hand, the knower may also be motivated on his own part to not want to know or properly understand his subject for fear that once he did, he no longer has excuse to not adjust or update his behavior relative to his new knowledge. Hence, he ignores and avoids as well as frustrates any attempt on the other's part to fully reveal themselves. This is akin to an epistemic threat wherein knowledge, in addition to bringing light, also drags along with it the duty of safeguarding it. Ignorance is blissful for a reason!

I could say that to be able to conceal or be selective with how much of our self-bounded identity we want revealed to others may sometimes be a comfort and escape from unwanted scrutiny, but I'm not sure the same positive angle can be found in the case of the person whose greatest yearning is to be known completely. I already stated what the person who avoids every opportunity to know another benefits from this: they get to escape the great burden of adjusting to that knowledge and having to constantly proof themselves worthy of it.

Lastly, from my experience and observation of people, those among us who desire (or even worse demands) to be known completely by their significant other(s) and who feel the least compulsion or need to conceal, protect or seal off parts of their ego/self from easy access are usually people with the lowest psychological distress threshold coupled with the least coping ability. This makes them have the greatest need (second only to those of children) to depend on their intimate or relational other to be able to cope sufficiently. But their intimate partner or relational other cannot appropriately support them unless they fully and accurately understand them. Hence, understanding this category of people may come with a great price: higher burden of care or responsibility which may in turn discourage intimate partners or relational others from being intentional about pursuing that knowledge or even worse, intentional about avoiding it.

Apologies for the lengthy commentary.

Expand full comment

No posts